January: a new year, a new chapter, and a time for remembering the journey so far and anticipating the path ahead. Our first month was named for the two-faced god Janus. In this post, one face of Janus gazes back at the early 1900s, when steam, electric, and gasoline vehicles all vied for dominance. Janus' other face peers forward from there, imagining a world where electric vehicles (EVs) prevailed in the early 1900s battle. On this What If? path, things would be very different today. If the butterfly wings flapped in a different direction a century ago and EVs had become the dominant vehicle technology, this would have completely reshaped the world we inhabit today, and what that could mean for our future.
In the bustling streets of the early 1900s, automobiles were a chaotic symphony of steam whistles, electric hums, and gasoline roars. Steam-powered vehicles chugged along with bulky boilers, electrics glided silently on nascent batteries, and internal combustion engines (ICE) sputtered along. In this 3-way competition for the future of personal transportation, it was ICE that ultimately claimed victory. Fueled by cheap oil, mass production innovations like Henry Ford's assembly line, and the allure of long-distance travel, the other technologies were outpaced. This ICE dominance steered a century of human engineering prowess and innovation toward refining the noisy, polluting heart of the automobile. While this path brought remarkable mobility, it also locked in environmental costs and global conflict. Imagine, though, if electric vehicles (EVs) had prevailed instead.
The ICE reign sparked countless breakthroughs, transforming a crude contraption into a pinnacle of power. Engineers tackled inefficiencies in fuel use, emissions, and performance, yielding innovations that powered global economies but there are limitations in the physics and chemistry of petroleum combustion that cannot be avoided. Here are several pivotal advancements in the design and control of internal combustion engines.
| Advancement | Circa | Key Benefits and Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Injection | 1950s | Replaced carburetors for precise fuel delivery, boosting efficiency by up to 15% and enabling smoother starts in cold weather. |
| Overhead Camshafts (OHC) | 1960s | Improved valve timing for better airflow, increasing power output by 20-30% without enlarging engines. |
| Variable Valve Timing | 1980s | Dynamically adjusts valve operation for optimal low-speed torque and high-speed power, cutting fuel use by 5-10%. |
| Direct Injection | 1990s | Sprays fuel straight into cylinders for leaner burns, enhancing economy by 15% and reducing emissions. |
| Turbocharging | 1960s (widespread 2000s) | Forces extra air into combustion for 30-50% more power from smaller engines, aiding downsizing for lighter vehicles. |
| Engine Control Units (ECUs) | 1970s | Computerized oversight of ignition and injection, optimizing performance and enabling real-time diagnostics for 10-20% better efficiency. |
These leaps made ICE vehicles more potent and parsimonious, yet they still guzzled fossil fuels and spewed carbon dioxide.
Now, let's pivot to the electric What if?. Suppose EVs, with their quiet elegance and zero tailpipe emissions, had outpaced rivals through better battery scaling or policy nudges. With a century's worth of ingenuity poured into batteries rather than pistons, our world might breathe easier today. A century of focused R&D would have supercharged battery tech, eclipsing the incremental tweaks of ICE. Today's vehicles might boast specifications that make current models seem quaint: ranges exceeding 1,000 miles on a single charge, thanks to solid-state batteries or something beyond today's lithium chemistries refined over generations. Acceleration could hit 0-60 mph in under 2 seconds as standard, with regenerative braking recapturing 90% of kinetic energy. Vehicle weights might drop 40% via advanced composites, born from EV-centric manufacturing that prioritized lightweight frames over heavy blocks. And prices? Entry-level sedans could cost under $15,000 USD, as economies of scale in battery production slash costs by 80% from early 1900s levels.
Energy density stands out as the crown jewel of this alternate ingenuity. Real-world lithium-ion batteries hover at 250-300 watt-hours per kilogram (Wh/kg), a far cry from gasoline's 12 kWh/kg effective density. However, with 100 years of undivided attention, EV batteries might reach 1.5 - 2 kWh/kg, rivaling fossil fuels (considering efficiencies) while sidestepping their toxicity. It's important to say that EVs are 4 to 5 times more efficient at turning energy into motion, so 2kWh of battery capacity is effectively worth 8 to 10 kWh of gasoline. This leap would stem from the relentless pursuit of materials like sodium-ion or metal-air cells, coupled with optimized manufacturing. Charging times could shrink to 5 minutes for a full top-up, powered by ubiquitous solar-gridded stations. Ultracapacitors, those quick-charge wonders storing energy electrostatically, would indeed be commonplace. Integrated into every EV, they'd handle burst power for acceleration or regen, extending battery life by 50% and enabling seamless grid-to-vehicle energy trading. Vehicles become rolling power banks, feeding homes during blackouts.
Societally, this EV utopia would ripple profoundly through people's mindsets and attitudes, fostering a regenerative lifestyle. Cities like Los Angeles or Beijing would have never choked on smog, sparing millions from respiratory ills and slashing healthcare costs by billions annually. Air quality improvements alone could boost global life expectancy today by 2-3 years.
Oil's diminished sway in this alternative timeline world would rewrite geopolitics: no OPEC cartels, fewer Middle East conflicts, and trillions of dollars redirected from drilling to renewables and reforestation. Wars might pivot to securing rare earth mines, or not occur at all, as renewable grids democratize energy. Culturally, the romance of the open road is enhanced with silent, scenic cruises and with pop culture celebrating inventors like Tesla as folk heroes rather than eccentrics. Modern challenges, like access to charging in rural areas, are long ago solved.
In reflecting on these paths, the ICE's century of triumphs feels like a detour from destiny, one that moved us forward on the tech tree but scarred the Earth. Electrification is the ultimate path. An EV-led world promises not just superior specs, but a restored planet: clearer skies, and easier breathing. As we stand at another crossroads with climate urgency, embracing electrics now honors that lost electric dream, urging us toward a sustainable harmonious future.





.jpg)







.jpg)